Some say the divil is dead, the divil is dead, the divil is dead.
Some say the divil is dead and burried in Killarney,
More say he rose again, more say he rose again,
More say he rose again and joined the British army Video
(1) Canada/Israel
I came across this article and thought that it's a good indication of the blinkers that trained "white" globalists wear: Harper says Canada has no history of colonialism
Tell that to our First Nations, eh?
It seemed to go well with this video from Ron. Canada is not only a result of colonialism it has always supported British and American colonialism, and now thoroughly supports the Israeli version.
See Ottawan Bahija Reghai's article on how Canada doesn't even want to financially support aid to the refugees Israel has created.
Ron's video expresses well the level of dedication required of boycotters of Israeli Apartheid if the boycott is to continue being successful. Clearly it's not our government that supports social programs; it's at the whim and ideology of whoever happens to head it up at a given time. That is not democray, nor is it freedom of thought and speech. But it does show what we're up against now and where things are heading.
Some people think the move toward privatization in Ontario, for instance, is the result of Liberal ideology, but the federal Conservatives are just as much in favour. All it means is that there's now officially no diff between a LibCon and an AllCon (or a DemCon and a RepubCon), federally, provincially or municipally. The global agenda is pure corporate capitalist fundamentalism, and that means "white" control over all shades of brown-skinned peoples, especially those who live in resource-rich areas.
And if you still haven't got your head around global (corporate) governance, and Obama's role in it, rest assured the UN definitely has. See Margaret's input below.
=====
(2) Carbonhagen
From Margaret in Europe:
U.N. chief weighs in on climate talk expectations
One of the principles agreed upon is that all commitments should be reportable, measurable and verifiable. This is what has been agreed by both developed and developing countries.
We will establish a global governance structure to monitor and manage the implementation of this. Experts from both worlds should participate.
And I believe that the fact that President Obama has agreed to participate himself may suggest that the U.S. has some better understandings on what China and India will do. He has been instrumental in changing the political dynamics of this debate.
Sounds like everyone is agreed about global governance and that India and China are to take the lead in the global economy.
Lord Monckton breaks down Copenhagen - part 1 (video)
He says that all that is happening- demonstrations, the African boycott etc is all "street theatre" and that, in fact, all was decided before the talks even started. He asserts that the true thrust behind this meeting is hammering out the formation of a vast network of administrative bodies - and how to pay for them - that is forming the beginnings of global government.
It could be easy to discredit Monckton because he is "one of them" but I would suggest that he may be right because, in fact, he has a bit of an axe to grind with them.
Monckton has referred to himself as a "peer of the House of Lords" but is not a member of that body. Monckton was an unsuccessful candidate for a Conservative seat in the House of Lords in a March 2007 by-election caused by the death of Lord Mowbray and Stourton. He received no votes in the election. He was highly critical of the way that the Lords had been reformed, describing the by-election procedure, with 43 candidates and 47 electors, as "a bizarre constitutional abortion."
He also belongs to many humanitarian organizations:
Monckton is a member of the Worshipful Company of Broderers, an Officer of the Order of St. John of Jerusalem, a Knight of Honour and Devotion of the Sovereign Military Order of Malta, and a member of the Roman Catholic Mass Media Commission.
Quotes are from Wikipedia.
I'll send part 2 when it's released.
YYC: Methinks the Wiki article was written by Monckton himself. You'll laugh when I tell you why: it contains the word "
riposte" - a frightfully, upper class British word, wouldn't you say? But he
writes for and is an adviser to the
Science and Public Policy Institute which appears to have a substantial body of scientific advisers - people who know, or should know, at least as much as the global warming proponents.
Who funds any of them seems moot at this point since both sides appear to be funded by corporate interests, as are political parties and wars.
Monckton's "
Apocalypse? No!" is available on Google for anyone who is interested. In it he claimed to be as balanced as Fox News, and he didn't seem to be joking.
I admit again, for the record, I don't know whether or not gobal warming is the issue it's made out to be, but I can see lots of reasons why the powers that be would want us to get worked up about it - because in order to mitigate the problem we will have to have world government, and they would prefer we submit willingly to that rather than that they be forced to force it upon us (that's their idea of democracy - making us want their oppression).
On the same page as Monckton's video there's one titled:
1983: The Brink Of Apocalypse discussing how perilously close the Cold Warriors came to nuking the planet. Now that's what I call an apocalypse, and they didn't even bother to tell us about it until after it was all over! So my motto is the more they yell about stuff, the less credible it very likely is.
Monckton's video is seductive to me for a reason you might not suspect. It happens that I'm in love with Inspector Morse who travels in the pomp of Oxfordian circles while maintaining a fine disdain for it that helps me to tolerate it (you can get some of the flavour of that in
this full length episode - and enjoy a Japanese commercial ad as well).
Travelled, I should say, since the Morse series concluded long ago and actor
John Thaw himself is now tucked into an urn. As Morse, he dies of his penchant for drink (John Thaw was also an alcoholic as well as a heavy smoker) in
the last episode, and I haven't been able to bring myself to watch that full episode again, though I've seen all the others numerous times.
Morse is extremely lame around women he finds attractive, can't stand to look at a corpse, and he's often unkind to his sidekick Lewis, with whom I'm almost as much in love. What a pair they make - upper crust sensibilities teamed up with plain, ordinary common sense. Have I digressed enough?
Perhaps
a complete change-about is in order, just to rest the thoughts - although the reverence expressed in this video for a certain talking head is cause for mild alarm. Still, I couldn't be more enthralled with it, I must say. The funniest part in the whole thing is that he says his line about the picture being crooked but it isn't and he has to make it crooked himself in order to continue the segment.
Okay, it's not really a change-about. The guy ends up dancing with the devil, for pete's sake, just like our so-called leaders and their media mouthpieces. Martin Short is very deep, I must say.
at close of day ...
