Contributor: "YYC"
‘Up-skirt’ photos snapped at CNE air show: police
Bruno Lombardi, 57, of Richmond Hill, has been charged with two counts of voyeurism for sexual purpose.
"Voyeurism for sexual purpose?" Doesn't that happen in living rooms the world over every day?
As usual, the media are in such a rush to get out a titillating story that they literally have no story to tell. Just like movies that rely heavily on sexuality and/or violence in lieu of actual content.
How long were the skirts, for instance? Ultra short ones invite curiosity, much the same as kilts do. How did the women discover they were photographed? Were they together, or was this a random act? Did the women have features in common, such as the same colour hair? How did the police locate and identify the man who took the pics?
Were the skirts long but the women were wearing patent leather shoes? That was a big no-no back in my youth because men could see your undies reflected in them, and it only egged them on.
See, this is why I prefer to wear pants. For sure, you don't want to be wearing a skirt when you're walking up a set of metal stairs with no risers. Were the women sitting on bleachers? Same thing.
Look at
this video clip of former Governor General Michaelle Jean and interviewer, and be honest with yourself about what most drew your attention. The camera people knew what would. Is this a dignified view of a former representative of royalty?
Women are far too vulnerable in skirts, yet they wear them - and those hobbling high heels - to emulate what they see on TV and in movies - even a Governor General. They don't want to just be attractive women, they want to appear seductive. Nowadays, even wearing a dress that looks like a petticoat, or a blouse that looks like a camisole, is the done thing. Women are wearing their underwear on the outside, and pictures get taken every day of women doing that.
Not to defend this sicko at all, but if voyeurism is a crime why are we all, male and female, being encouraged in it by the entertainment media? So many of today's movies rely on sexualized images (combined with frantic car chases, murder, torture, general scenes of violence, mayhem and destruction) to attract audiences. Characters are not well drawn, stories not very complex. How very modern.
It certainly diverts minds from what's really going on in the world today.
I can't believe the lack of mental nutrition available on the DVD shelf at the local branch of my public library. I look at those sweet, school teacherish ladies behind the desk and I wonder, do they know what they're stocking their shelves with?
Personally I'm thankful that the grossest (puking, peeing, farting) or raunchiest scenes often come in the first few frames of a movie, so it doesn't take long for me to figure out there's probably not much of a storyline and I can just turn it off.
Full frontal female nudity is commonplace, but in general the male organ is still considered ever-so-sacred, so we make do with views of male buttocks instead, in the act of copulating, masturbating or urinating. Maybe they put this stuff up front to induce people to watch further in the hope there'll be more of the same, but if that's all they've got to sell a movie, I say forget it.
I'm not a voyeur. I've never even had the slightest curiosity about other people's personal lives, unless they're public figures who have presented false images of themselves. I figure this is an indication that I have an interesting life of my own.
Even in a movie I think I might like, once the face-sucking or rutting begins to overstate its point (come on, there's artful, tender love-making and then there's animalistic behaviour you would be shocked out of your mind to find your teenager indulging in on your living room couch) I find myself muttering, "Okay, I get the idea. Point made. Move on. Tell the story, why doncha - if you've got any to tell. That's enough. That's enough."
Some people have no clue when enough is enough, and for those pathetic individuals the impact on the nervous system creates a mindset where it's all they can think about. It's true that once you see certain images, you can't unsee them.
It's little wonder there's hardly a couple alive who don't think there's something missing in their sex life - because movies create entirely selfish and unrealistic expectations. Consequently, there are too many "happily married"
Col. William Russells out there running around.
Sickos aren't born; they're created. And then we charge them with a crime.