Norway shooter's "insanity"

... an excellent cover for mind control experimentation

Contributor: "YYC"

Norway gunman declared insane: prosecutor

If he is declared criminally insane and sentenced to closed psychiatric care, a judge will review his sentence every three years.

If he recovers from his illness, he could theoretically be transferred to a prison if he were considered a threat to society. He could also be released if the opposite scenario were to present itself.

What? Did we ask too many questions? Will any of them be asked in court?

This tends to confirm for me my own earlier speculation:

... photos of Breivik wearing Lacoste sweaters prior to the massacre and during his arrest proceedings (where he had gained considerable weight that changed the shape of his face, and had lost considerable hair), were proudly bandied about by the media, but now that he is wearing a dark suit with a tie, photos and videos of him are verboten.

Is this an effort to avoid tainting the conservative uniform, or is it because Breivik is a walking false flag who will need to be unrecognizable once this whole thing fades into the past and a cover story aids his release once more into the wild?

In three years?

In early 2009 Vince Li was diagnosed as insane and has been cared for in a psychiatric facility. Last year on his doctor's advice he was allowed to have walks outside. This year doctors are recommending a reduction in supervision while he is outside. We're not seeing any recent photos of him either. Would he be recognizable if he were returned to, or escaped to, the street?

Oh, soon he won't have to escape to the street:

... Li could also be given future passes for supervised visits into the town of Selkirk, said doctors.

I'm not against help for the insane, and certainly not against justice for victims of mind control experiments, but are there no psychiatrists who can tell the difference between the two - and have the guts to say so?

Related on YYC: "Lone Assassins" - protected for jobs well done?