Belonging, like Gustave Courbet to "no school, to no church, to no institution, to no academy,
least of all to any régime except the régime of liberty",
with a healthy dose of logic and common sense and a tendency to question everything.
_____________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Monday, 27 September 2010

A Toxic Agenda?

Illegal BP Oil Spill Photos

"You Are Not Authorized to See These Pictures of the Oil Spill, Citizen ... Do Not Look! "

Preface: The title is a parody of the fact that the government has effectively made it a felony to take pictures of oiled wildlife.

CAUTION: some photos are of wild life in distress or dead - not for the squeamish or animal lovers...
(photo pinched from collection rounded up by Jonathan Elinoff)

In consideration of the media block imposed by BP and backed by a complicit US government, is it any surprise litigation over spill damages will be minimized, "guided and handled" in BP's favour?

BP attempts to buy up Gulf scientists for legal defense
"BP is seeking to add scientists to the legal team that will fight the Natural Resources Damage Assessment lawsuit that the federal government will bring as a result of the Gulf oil spill. The contract requires scientists to agree to withhold data even in the face of a court order if BP decides to fight such an order.

It stipulates that scientists will be paid only for research approved in writing by BP.
With its payments, BP buys more than the scientists' services, according to Wiygul.

It also buys silence, he said, thanks to confidentiality clauses in the contracts.
"

The Corexit should have been sprayed all over Wall Street...
Media ignores Goldman Sachs’ ties to Corexit dispersant
In a recent New York Times’ article “Less Toxic Dispersants Lose Out in BP Oil Spill Cleanup”, journalist Paula Quinlan questions why BP is using the 100 % toxic, 54 percent effective dispersant Corexit to clean up the oil when twelve other dispersants proved more effective in EPA testing.

Quinlan only looks at part of the picture. She associates BP’s investment in Nalco and oil industry representation on the board as the main reasons that Corexit was used instead of Dispirsit, which EPA testing shows to be twice as effective and a third less toxic. Yes, BP is hedging its losses with the profit it will make with its investment in Nalco, but who else benefits?


Follow the money…and the money goes to Goldman Sachs and friends.

Since the doomsday, nasty huge methane bubble never blew (could it still or are they saving that as a catastrophic HAARP exercise to de-populate the entire Gulf, if the regular scare tactics don't work), here is the latest junk science threat...
The North Atlantic Current is Gone
The latest satellite data establishes that the North Atlantic Current (also called the North Atlantic Drift) no longer exists and along with it the Norway Current. These two warm water currents are actually part of the same system that has several names depending on where in the Atlantic Ocean it is.

The entire system is a key part of the planet's heat regulatory system; it is what keeps Ireland and the United Kingdom mostly ice free and the Scandinavia countries from being too cold; it is what keeps the entire world from another Ice Age. This Thermohaline Circulation System is now dead in places and dying in others.


The following is interesting from the perspective of it's a case of potential cooling? Does that imply Britain's carbon trading points could double? (following non italicized comments in brackets, are mine)
Britain faces big freeze as Gulf Stream loses strength
THE Gulf Stream currents that give Britain its mild climate have weakened dramatically, offering the first firm scientific evidence of a slowdown that threatens the country with temperatures as cold as Canada’s. (can you imagine living in an ice palace Camila?)

The Atlantic Ocean “conveyor belt” that carries warm water north from the tropics has weakened by 30 per cent in 12 years, scientists have discovered. The findings, from the National Oceanography Centre in Southampton, give the strongest indication yet that Europe’s central heating system is breaking down under the impact of global warming.


Scientists have long predicted that melting ice caps could disrupt the currents that keep Britain at least 5C (40F) warmer than it should be, but the new research suggests that this is already under way. It points to a cooling of 1C over the next decade or two, and an even deeper freeze could follow if the Gulf Stream system were to shut down altogether.


The British Isles lie on the same latitude as Labrador on the East Coast of Canada, and are protected from a similarly icy climate by the Atlantic conveyor belt, which carries a million billion watts of heat.

Although oceanographers still think it unlikely that the currents will stop completely, this could reduce average temperatures by between 4C and 6C in as little as 20 years, far outweighing any increase predicted as a result of global warming.
(so rather than admit global warming is a hoax, it will be used to justify this cooling. In fact the global cooling trend will probably be blamed on melted Arctic ice, which is a complete joke.)

Even a lesser fall in temperatures could mean that Britain gets colder even as the rest of the world warms up, and would severely disrupt the Government’s plans for mitigating the effects of climate change.
(In other words...we are caught with our pants down)

Here's where it gets very interesting. US scientists disagree with British scientists. Perhaps because HAARP weather modifications are at play, the US doesn't want to be associated with, or acknowledge any possible changing trends, noted in recent studies of the current.

Gulf Stream 'is not slowing down'
Between 2002 and 2009, the team says, there was no trend discernible - just a lot of variability on short timescales. The Atlantic overturning circulation is still an important player in today's climate.

The satellite record going back to 1993 did suggest a small increase in flow, although the researchers cannot be sure it is significant.
"The changes we're seeing in overturning strength are probably part of a natural cycle," said Josh Willis from Nasa's Jet Propulsion Laboratory (JPL) in California.

"The slight increase in overturning since 1993 coincides with a decades-long natural pattern of Atlantic heating and cooling."


Thanks to John from Manitoba for the following...and putting it all in perspective...

John writes..."Here is another satellite picture of the storms in the Southern Atlantic. A whole series of storm systems are pushed away from the gulf into the Atlantic. Previous years these systems went through the gap of Cuba and the Yucatan peninsula into the Gulf and out over Florida or the other Gulf states.

This year not a single Hurricane has made it into the Gulf. Either pressed North into the Atlantic or west into Central America or Mexico causing major flooding and land slides. If and when a Hurricane hits the Gulf, due to the presence of large amounts of oil and dispersant's, it could wipe out parts of Florida and other Gulf states.


Is this blatant weather control , I have no idea, but indications are it might be."

It's possible that the toxic agenda is being tested on Mexico and Central American countries? Sounds similar to the outbreak of H1N1...using people in this region as test victims.

Perhaps the weather is being "programmed" to temporarily keep the spill contained until all litigation is completed or all the players are put in place to guarantee the outcome. Then the US Gulf coastal de-population will begin.

0 comments:

CLICK HERE for information on How to create a "Hyperlink" (how to make Clickable Links)
when commenting in a blog -
plus some other useful HTML code.