The other shoe ...

There being no hard facts revealed since the first reports of the latest plane incident, media wags are embellishing non-stop to attract readers. So I feel compelled to do some un-embellishing.

From the Times:

Note the following:

The suspect himself immediately makes the claim of a connection to Al Qaeda. Right there is an indication that he works for an intelligence agency and that this event is geared to keeping people wary of plane flights and supportive of the "war on terror" - and especially Obama's Afghanistan surge, and whatever else he's got on tap.

Why do I know this? Because I know, and the suspect knows, that Al Qaeda doesn't exist.

It cetainly appears that international travel by ordinary people is being systematically discouraged - one because of the drain on fossil fuels, and two because we're easier to control if they know where we are at all times.

US intelligence reportedly already knew about this guy, yet let him fly, while innocent infants are placed on no-fly lists.

An unnamed US intelligence official said the suspect was planning to blow up the plane, even though witnesses said it seemed more like a firecracker - a small pop was heard.

The suspect himself is reported to have told officials that he had explosives taped to his leg.

So there he was, all dangerous and explosive, yet ordinary passengers were quickly able to subdue him, which is odd because not even militarily trained passengers on the 9/11 planes dared to try to subdue the alleged hijackers who were armed with only plastic box cutters.

The fact that the 9/11 passengers did not move against the hijackers (except in one dubious case) indicates to me that they were told it was a security exercise - there being a number of such drills carried out on the same day and even on the day of the London transit bombing.

Comparing the suspect to the shoe bomber is as much as saying it's all a fake scare tactic. The shoe bomber merely showed a stewardess the underside of his shoe with little wires sticking out of it, and he too was overpowered by passengers.

Let's face it; if the CIA were looking for recruits they could easily intimidate a petty criminal into working for them. Recent conversion to Islam could just as easily be a cover for carrying out terrorist-like scenarios as a new path in life. Mosques are heavily infiltrated by imposters who act as spies.

Even ordinary anti-war activist groups are routinely infiltrated by enforcement agencies.

From the BBC:

The NCTB said in a statement it could not rule out the potential for dangerous items to pass through security, especially objects that current security technology cannot detect.

Now that's odd, because there actually is a plethora of airport screening systems that can detect even minute amounts of explosives in both baggage and on passengers.

Finally, you gotta suspect a plant when the White House almost immediately weighs in to call it terrorism and call for an increase in airport security.

And let's face this: if "Al Qaeda" could pull off an extremely complicated procedure like 9/11, why have they been such terrible failures ever since? We're told it's because of improved security - but the would-be plane bombers got past security! If their explosives had worked, security or not there would be a lot of dead people.

To get an idea of how shady American agencies love to promote the idea of lone, crazed terrorists, see the excellent documentary "Evidence of Revision", which deals in minute detail, using all sorts of archived video you probably haven't seen, with the assassinations of JFK, RFK and MLK (as well as the shady associations of LBJ).

All three slain men were upsetting the US applecart with relation to war and social values, and we're supposed to believe they were all killed by separate, lone, crazed assassins? And don't forget the assassination of John Lennon who came out strongly, and therefore influentially, against war.

In addition, when it's well-documented by the mainstream media that the CIA supported mind control experiments, how can we be expected to believe they are not still involved in them? The Canadian experiments are fully covered in the documentary Evidence of Revision, linked to above.

I'm not the conspiracist; somebody with a lot of power in the US stays awake nights working on elaborate plots against unwanted public figures. And if Obama remains alive, it's because he's part of the whole agenda.

Related: VIDEO: Al Qaeda Doesn't Exist
Zbigniew Brzezinski, advisor to Barack Obama created "Al Qaeda" (meaning "the base") to rid Afghanistan of the Soviets. He assured them God was on their side, and he later stated that there was a greater threat from the Soviets overtaking Afghanistan than from the Taliban which grew out of his creation, the Mujahadeen.