Vaccines, Autism, and oh yes, Israel again!

Here's an item John in Manitoba sent me a couple of weeks ago:

Inoculations: The True Weapons of Mass Destruction

The reason for the delay in posting it is that it contains a paragraph on which I needed to get some clarification from the parent of an autistic child:

Although the symptoms of mercury poisoning have been described as identical to the symptoms of autism, it should be noted that most children who descend into the hellish state known as autism do so after the MMR vaccine. The MMR vaccine is one of the few vaccines that do not contain mercury; in fact, it has NEVER contained mercury. Thus, it is self-evident that the removal of mercury will not make vaccines “safe”. (This is why the mercury is the only thing being addressed at all; because when the people reading this paper realize that the very mechanism by which vaccines corrupt the immune system means that NO vaccine is safe and effective; there will be an evolution of consciousness where the structure of lies telling us vaccines are safe and effective disintegrates.)

You see, I know a parent who chelated her second eldest son (who had been diagnosed as severely autistic) in order to see if removal of mercury would help him. The chelation did help - this boy now goes to a regular school, has playmates like other kids, and is making great strides in his communication skills. Things aren't perfect for him, but he's not lost inside himself anymore. So it's always been in my mind that mercury was the sole culprit in autism, and it was confusing to me that so many parents saw their children slip away from them after the MMR inoculation, which never contained mercury.

Here is clarification straight from the (anonymous) horse's mouth:

*****

Yes, I agree whole-heartedly that the vaccine debate has been reduced to a mercury issue. This makes it simpler to poopoo anyone who is concerned about vaccine safety - "What are you going on about- they took out mercury so vaccines are safe!" It's a great way to cut short any discussion about vaccine safety. In fact, I no longer participate in these discussion boards simply because people do not listen to anything beyond the mercury debate.

For my second eldest son R...., I think the bulk of his problem was with the mercury but I'll tell you, we also chelated piles of aluminum out of him (the favoured adjuvant before the more modern and more immunologically-destructive, squalene.) At the time I had no idea where the aluminum had come from. R.... never got the MMR but my eldest son J.... did and I will never forgive myself for that either. He really suffered - terrible weight loss (he was a little stick boy) his hair fell out, he threw up and suffered gastritis quite frequently in that era. I thought it was all my fault, that I wasn't looking after him properly. You can imagine, J.... chronically sick and R.... never stopped screaming and everyone around me telling me that this was normal for children.

I am grateful that we stopped vaccinating when we did - R.... could have been so much worse. I see those kids at the mall, sabotaged children all withered-up, staring at nothing, hands flopping uselessly about them, drooling - lost forever. And their parents, well-programmed by the authorities that whatever happened to their beautiful baby was an act of God (genetics) and they very dutifully chose not to have more. And I see them eyeing my kids and wondering why God did this to them and why I should be so lucky to have not just one but 4 beautiful children with a future and potential. I see it in their eyes. I am grateful but I am also filled with remorse.

The best way to keep the agenda going on track is to keep people busy with lots of paradigms over which to argue endlessly simply because there is no room for compromise. The issue of vaccine safety is not about mercury but about how vaccines are made and the mercury thingy stops everyone from thinking critically about the vaccine industry as a whole and so on it goes without interference.

*****

I read that there was going to be an official study done of chelation to see if it could win medical approval, but the study has been cancelled. Too risky, they say. But a blatant obfuscation is presented to explain away the effectiveness of alternative treatments:

Offit adds that very young children with mild symptoms of autism often get better on their own later in childhood, which may explain why many parents believe so strongly that alternative treatment work."There is a natural wax and wane with this disorder," he says. "Symptoms that seem very bad between the ages of 2 and 5 may get much better between the ages of 6 and 10."

They are ignoring the cases of severely autistic children who improve dramatically after chelation treatment.

Hard to say if they're afraid they won't be able to prove chelation ineffective and that what they will prove is that vaccines are dangerous, or if they've already been criticized for preliminary studies on rodents that don't appear to me to have taken into account the use of supplements to restore the good minerals removed along with the bad ones. Without those supplements, it is no wonder that some healthy rodents fell ill after being chelated.

The unwillingness to look seriously at the dangers of the proliferation of vaccines, along with the move to suppress the use of home remedies for all sorts of conditions, is not about protecting our precious children but about protecting profits for big pharm.

=========================

Other Important Stuff:

Thanks again to John:

The wonders of the modern controlled press

I am confused
Yes, very confused….
A convoy of Human Rights Workers was headed to Gaza to deliver much needed medical equipment, children’s toys and construction material. On board were a number of American citizens, including a former Congresswoman and Presidential candidate.

Uniformed pirates, members of the Israeli Navy, kidnapped these people and hauled them off to a prison in Israel. They were charged with being in Israel illegally.

OK….. that’s where the confusion sets in…. who dragged them off to Israel? They were in International waters with no intention of setting foot on Israeli soil.

By now, we all know the frustration felt by the little boy who saw clearly that the emperor was starkers yet nobody else seemed to notice. It's called hysterical blindness, and the media seem more and more affected by it.